Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03780530
Different Techniques for Perineal Skin Closure During Mediolateral Episiotomy Repair
Comparison of Different Techniques for Perineal Skin Closure During Mediolateral Episiotomy Repair
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 207 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Ain Shams University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
this study aims to assess the efficacy and the safety of various cosmetic techniques (subcuticular, surgical glue, adhesive tapes) for perineal skin closure during mediolateral episiotomy repair
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | subcuticular suturing | Those undergoing Subcuticular suturing of perineal skin using 910 polyglactin vicryl No 2/0 (EGYCRYL®). |
| PROCEDURE | Surgical glue | Those undergoing perineal skin closure using adhesive glue n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl®). |
| PROCEDURE | adhesive steri-strip tape | Those undergoing closure of perineal skin via Adhesive surgical water-resistant tape application. (3M® Transpore™ Surgical Tapes). |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2019-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2019-10-01
- Completion
- 2019-12-01
- First posted
- 2018-12-19
- Last updated
- 2018-12-20
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03780530. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.