NCT03767309

Management of Miller Class I & II Gingival Recession

Management of Miller Class I & II Gingival Recession Using Conventional Versus Abrasive De-epithelization of Palatal Graft

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 20 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Halla Gamal Mohammed Esmail · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Management of Miller class I \& II gingival recession using coronally advanced flap combined with conventional de-epithelialized free gingival graft versus coronally advanced flap combined with abrasive de-epithelized connective tissue graft Null hypothesis: In patients with Miller class I and II gingival recession, there is no difference between coronally advanced flap with conventional de-epithelialized free gingival graft and coronally advanced flap with abrasive de-epithelized connective tissue graft in recession depth reduction.

Conditions

• Gingival Recession

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	coronally advanced flap with abrasive de-epithelized graft.	SCTG will be harvested from the palate by abrasive de-epithelialization of palatal graft involves removing the epithelium of the selected area with a high-speed hand piece and diamond bur
PROCEDURE	coronally advanced flap with de-epithelized graft.	SCTG will be harvested from the palate by abrasive de-epithelialization of palatal graft involves removing the epithelium of the selected area with a blade

Timeline

• Start date: 2019-02-01
• Primary completion: 2020-01-01
• Completion: 2020-12-01
• First posted: 2018-12-06
• Last updated: 2019-01-17