NCT03715517

Spinal Anesthesia For Enhanced Recovery After Liver Surgery

Spinal Anesthesia for Enhanced Recovery After Liver Surgery

• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 128 (estimated)
• Sponsor: University of Manitoba · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

This project proposes to compare epidural versus spinal anesthesia in patients having liver resection surgery. The investigators hypothesize that spinal anesthesia will result in improved blood pressure control postoperatively and reduce the amount of intravenous fluids required after surgery. Spinal anesthesia is expected to provide the same pain control benefits as epidurals, with faster recovery of function. Spinal anesthesia may be a simple and effective way to improve and enhance the recovery in the increasing number of patients requiring liver resection.

Detailed description

Hepatic resection surgery (hepatectomy) for primary or metastatic malignancy is a major operation involving large, painful upper abdominal incisions, as well as considerable postoperative physiological derangements. Uncontrolled postoperative incisional pain results in significant respiratory impairment, delayed mobilization, and augmentation of the surgically-induced stress response, placing patients at increased risk of postoperative complications and chronic post-surgical pain. Acute pain management with high-dose parenteral opioids further compounds this risk. Multimodal opioid-sparing therapy, and regional anesthesia in particular, is therefore an essential component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways and patient-centred care. Regional anesthesia using neuraxial block (intraoperative spinal anesthesia or thoracic epidural anesthesia) followed by postoperative continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (CTEA; postoperative administration of epidural local anesthetic and/or opioid) is the best method for treating pain following large abdominal surgeries, including liver resection, and has been shown to improve postoperative respiratory function and decrease respiratory complications in other surgeries. However, the effects of intraoperative neuraxial block and postoperative CTEA on fluid balance, systemic hemodynamics, and functional recovery after hepatic resection surgery remain controversial. CTEA is frequently associated with postoperative hypotension, resulting in increased perioperative intravenous (IV) fluid administration, red blood cell transfusion, and vasopressor use in liver resection patients. For major hepatectomies, CTEA may also be an independent risk factor for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), presumably due to impairment of renal autoregulation. Excessive IV fluid administration in the postoperative period is associated with significant weight gain, often necessitating diuretic therapy; delayed return of gastrointestinal function; increased need for packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion due to hemodilution; increased infective complications due to this increased pRBC transfusion rate; and increased length of hospital stay. In addition, concerns remain about the use of CTEA following liver resection surgery due to the potentially increased risk of epidural hematoma formation in the setting of postoperative coagulopathy. This concern has resulted in unplanned delays in epidural catheter removal postoperatively, due to persistent coagulation abnormalities, prolonging hospitalization by 1-3 d in up to 15% of patients. These concerns about the consequences of excess fluid administration and the safety of CTEA for liver resection surgery have prompted the use of alternative and/or ancillary analgesic techniques, particularly for major resections and in patients with preoperative liver dysfunction, for whom a prolonged period of postoperative coagulopathy is anticipated. Intraoperative spinal anesthesia (SA) using local anesthetic (LA) and/or opioid (most commonly intrathecal morphine \[ITM\]) for neuraxial block without CTEA is frequently used as postoperative analgesia for various surgeries. Spinal anesthesia using ITM without LA has been reported in four randomized and three non-randomized studies of patients undergoing liver resections. ITM has provided superior analgesia to IV patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with opioids, and equivalent analgesia to epidural infusions. Compared with CTEA and/or IV-PCA, ITM was associated with reduced IV fluid administration; earlier mobilization, and resumption of normal dietary intake; decreased incidence of respiratory complications; and decreased hospital length of stay. Spinal anesthesia using both LA and ITM may provide an additional benefit by providing a degree of preemptive analgesia, as well as by decreasing the stress and inflammatory response, thereby possibly decreasing the incidence of surgical stress-related complications such as postoperative delirium. High-spinal anesthesia (HSA) uses larger doses of LA to achieve a "high" block for this purpose. HSA combined with ITM has been used in cardiac surgery, and decreases the stress and inflammatory response to surgery; facilitates early extubation; improves postoperative analgesia; decreases the incidence of postoperative delirium; and decreases intensive care unit (ICU) readmissions. Neither the use of HSA (with or without ITM) for analgesia following non-cardiac surgical procedures, nor the effectiveness of SA with ITM versus CTEA following hepatic resection surgery has been investigated to date.

Conditions

• Hepatectomy
• Pain, Postoperative
• Liver Neoplasms

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia	Needle/catheter: 17 Ga. × 80 mm Tuohy epidural needle (Perican®, B. Braun Medical Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA); Arrow FlexTip Plus® 19 Ga. epidural catheter (Arrow International Inc., Reading, PA, USA) Level of insertion and patient positioning: T6-T8, upright sitting position for insertion of needle and catheter (to 5 cm beyond loss-of-resistance point) and for injection of test dose (3 mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000); supine for injection of bolus dose Confirmation of correct placement: Loss of resistance to air or saline; negative aspiration of the epidural catheter; negative test dose; and ease of injection of an initial bolus dose
PROCEDURE	Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine	Needle/catheter: 25 Ga. × 90 mm high-flow Whitacre spinal needle (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) Level of insertion and patient positioning: L2-L3, lateral decubitus position during injection; immediately post-injection, patient is placed supine in \<5% degree of Trendelenburg Confirmation of correct placement: Aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid
DRUG	Bupivacaine 0.75% in Dextrose Inj 8.25%	0.25 mg⋅kg-¹ hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75%
DRUG	Morphine	3 mcg⋅kg-¹ intrathecal morphine (preservative-free)
DRUG	Bupivacaine 0.25% Preservative-Free Injectable Solution	0.25 mg⋅kg-¹ bupivacaine 0.25%
DRUG	Bupicavaine 0.125% epidural solution	Epidural solution, bupivacaine 0.125% with hydromorphone 10 mcg·mL-¹, infusion range 0.075-0.125 mL⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹
DRUG	Hydromorphone 10 mcg/mL epidural solution	Epidural solution, bupivacaine 0.125% with hydromorphone 10 mcg·mL-¹, infusion range 0.075-0.125 mL⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹

Timeline

• Start date: 2018-10-04
• Primary completion: 2031-07-31
• Completion: 2031-12-31
• First posted: 2018-10-23
• Last updated: 2026-02-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Canada