NCT03665376

Feasibility and Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) on Length of Stay Among Laparotomy Patients at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital

Feasibility and Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) on Length of Stay Among Laparotomy Patients at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 33 (actual)
• Sponsor: Mbarara University of Science and Technology · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The main goal of ERAS is to enhance the recovery of patients, and this has secondary effects, such reduced length of hospital stay, minimal postoperative complications and lessen readmission rates. ERAS protocols have been shown to be feasible and safe across the world. Although it has been shown to be effective in the developed settings and can potentially reduce the length of hospital stay, and the cost of healthcare in the perioperative period. The multimodal program of ERAS has been less implemented in the low and middle income African countries. Studies done outside Uganda (Egypt and South Africa) have demonstrated that ERAS program can be feasible and yields favorable outcomes in patients.

Detailed description

The efficacy of ERAS has been demonstrated in resource rich settings but limited evidence is available from resource poor settings. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and test efficacy of ERAS in reducing length of post-operative hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative complications compared to the standard of care as the control group. 33 participants above 18 years of age, undergoing laparotomy, were randomly assigned to an intervention (ERAS) arm or to a control (standard surgical care) arm at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in Uganda. The ERAS and the control arm had 16 and 17 patients respectively, followed-up 14 days after surgery. Patients in the ERAS arm had 2.4 days (SD 0.7) of post-operative hospital stay shorter than those in the control arm, p=0.0025 (4.1±0.2 vs 6.5±0.6 respectively). 18.8% of patients in the control arm developed post-operative complications compared to 5.9% in the ERAS arm (Statistical insignificance, p=0.34). ERAS patients passed flatus eight hours earlier than patients in the control arm, and mobilisation out of bed happened 12 hours earlier in the ERAS group p value=0.4. ERAS is feasible at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, and it leads to reduced hospital stay duration but not post-operative complications in laparotomy cases.

Conditions

• Laparotomy

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT	Carbohydrate drink load	Administration of 5% Dextrose orally as a carbohydrate drink load two hours before surgery and as an oral sips eight hours after the surgery.
COMBINATION_PRODUCT	Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)	The ERAS intervention consisted of exposing patients to ERAS protocol of care as described by the ERAS Society® for the entire perioperative period. However, some of these ERAS protocols were modified to our local resources and requirements.

Timeline

• Start date: 2017-06-01
• Primary completion: 2017-07-30
• Completion: 2017-08-15
• First posted: 2018-09-11
• Last updated: 2018-09-11

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Uganda