Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03615352

Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy Versus Aspiration and Coagulation in Ovarian Endometrioma

Impact of Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy Versus Aspiration and Coagulation on Ovarian Reserve and Pelvic Pain in Cases of Ovarian Endometrioma

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
92 (actual)
Sponsor
Shaimaa Mostafa Mohammed Refaay El shemy · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
20 Years – 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus aspiration and coagulation on ovarian reserve and pelvic pain in cases of ovarian endometrioma.

Detailed description

All patients are presenting with ovarian endometrioma. They are all subjected to informed written consent, full history, general examination, local examination and transvaginal ultrasound. Follicular stimulating hormone (FSH), Lutenizing hormone (LH), Anti Mullerian hormone (AMH), Antral follicular count (AFC) and chronic pelvic pain which is assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain scoring system ,all are to be determined before and after laparoscopic surgery (postoperative three months); for two groups (Group A) cystectomy and (Group B) aspiration and coagulation. Histopathological examination was done to the cystectomy group to confirm endometriosis and detect the presence of healthy ovarian tissue in the excised cyst wall.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREovarian cystectomylaparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in endometrioma
PROCEDUREovarian cyst aspiration and coagulationlaparoscopic ovarian cyst aspiration and coagulation in endometrioma

Timeline

Start date
2018-01-01
Primary completion
2018-10-01
Completion
2018-10-01
First posted
2018-08-03
Last updated
2019-01-31

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03615352. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.