Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03609307
Comparison of Treatment Response to Intravitreal Injection of Combined Propranolol and Bevacizumab Versus Bevacizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Wet Age Related Macular Degeneration :A Clinical Trial
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 2 / Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 40 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 50 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
This study is designed to compare the effect of combined intravitreal Bevacizumab and Propranolol injection versus Bevacizumab monotherapy in patients with Age Related Macular Degeneration. Methods: In this study patients with Age Related Macular Degeneration who are naïve or had history of previous treatment are included. The eligible patients in randomized in two groups "Bevacizumab" and "Bavacizumab + propranolol" and in injected intravitreally for 3 times monthly. In "Bevacizumab+propranolol" group patients receive two injections at each session Bavacizumab and propranolol. In "Bevacizumab" group patients receive only Bevacizumab. The patients are followed for 6 months and central macular thickness and visual acuity is measured at baseline and monthly for 6 month. Baseline ancillary exams include Fluorescein Angiography and OCT-Angiography which is performed at the final exam as well. Patients needing any therapeutic intervention is addressed during the 6 month follow up period.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Combined Intravitreal bevacizumab and propranolol | these patients receive two injections at each session Bavacizumab and propranolol |
| DRUG | Intravitreal bevacizumab | these patients receive only Bevacizumab |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-10-01
- Completion
- 2019-02-01
- First posted
- 2018-08-01
- Last updated
- 2018-08-01
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Iran
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03609307. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.