NCT03589196

Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization Versus Plasma Kinetic Vaporization Versus Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate: A RCT

Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization Versus Plasma Kinetic Vaporization Versus Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate For Management Of Benign Prostatic Enlargement: An Objective Evaluation Through a Prospective Randomized Trial

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 84 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Mansoura University · Academic / Other
• Sex: Male
• Age: 50 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

To Evaluate and compare the outcome and coast of ejaculation sparing management of BPH using 3 different techniques: PVP, PKVP and TURP. Ejaculation sparing TURP group is considered the standard control group. Evaluation will be carried out through a prospective randomized powered trial

Conditions

• Ejaculation Abnormal
• BPH With Urinary Obstruction
• Prostatic Hyperplasia
• Prostate Disease
• Prostate Obstruction

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization	Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization
PROCEDURE	Ejaculation Preserving Plasma Kinetic Vaporization	Ejaculation Preserving Plasma Kinetic Vaporization
PROCEDURE	Ejaculation Preserving Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate	Ejaculation Preserving Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate

Timeline

• Start date: 2018-03-10
• Primary completion: 2019-06-01
• Completion: 2019-12-01
• First posted: 2018-07-17
• Last updated: 2018-07-17

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt