Trials / Terminated
TerminatedNCT03580798
Ridge Preservation Comparing Simultaneous vs. Delayed Grafting
Ridge Preservation Comparing the Traditional Approach vs. Early Implant Placement With Simultaneous Contour Augmentation
- Status
- Terminated
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 7 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University of Louisville · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Comparison of the clinical healing of simultaneous vs. delayed grafting for dental implant placement.
Detailed description
The primary aims of this study are to compare the clinical and histologic results of a traditional ridge preservation with implant placement at 16 weeks (control group) with early implant placement (8 weeks) with simultaneous contour augmentation as described by Buser (test group).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Delayed graft | 8 weeks post-extraction 15 test patients will receive implant placement plus osseous grafting. |
| PROCEDURE | Simultaneous graft | At the time of extraction osseous graft will be placed in the socket and implant placed 4 months later. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-11-08
- Primary completion
- 2019-04-26
- Completion
- 2019-04-26
- First posted
- 2018-07-09
- Last updated
- 2020-09-10
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03580798. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.