Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03567629
Evaluate the Efficacy of Irinotecan Versus Oxaliplatin in the First-line Treatment of Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
A Prospective, Open-lable, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Irinotecan Versus Oxaliplatin in the First-line Treatment of Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 130 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Peking University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is a prospective, open-lable, multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase II clinical study. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of Irinotecan versus Oxaliplatin in the first-line treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Detailed description
This trial is conducted in patients with the refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Eligible patients are randomized into two arms at 1:1 ratio to receive Irinotecan-based regimen or Oxaliplatin-based regimen until progress of the disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent by the patient. Study evaluation time is until death of patient or a deadline set by the researchers.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Irinotecan | Irinotecan 180 mg / m2, intravenous drip, D1, combined with fluorouracil / calcium folinate or Capecitabine or S1; combine or not combine with Bevacizumab or Cetuximab; every 14 days for a cycle. |
| DRUG | Oxaliplatin | Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 (two-week regimen) or 130mg/m2 (three week regimen), intravenous drip, D1, combined with fluorouracil / calcium folinate or Capecitabine or S1; combine or not combine with Bevacizumab or Cetuximab; every 14 or 21 days for a cycle. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-05-29
- Primary completion
- 2021-12-30
- Completion
- 2023-12-30
- First posted
- 2018-06-26
- Last updated
- 2018-06-26
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03567629. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.