Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03566212

Efficacy of Camouflaged Syringe vs Conventional Syringe

Clinical Comparative Study of Efficacy of Camouflaged Syringe vs Conventional Syringe in Reducing Dental Anxiety

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60 (actual)
Sponsor
Sneha D. Suwarnkar · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
3 Years – 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of Camouflage syringe vs Conventional syringe in reducing Dental Anxiety and increasing behaviour rating.Half of the participants received local anesthesia using camouflaged syringe, while others received using conventional syringe.

Detailed description

Dental anxiety and phobia result in avoidance of dental care. Since the injection itself can be painful, pain reduction procedures warrant continued investigation. Camouflage design deals with the visual impact of the needle and syringe though the tactile sensation remains unaltered. In our study, post treatment anxiety levels in camouflaged syringe was reduced as compared to conventional syringe group and this might be because, patients with low anxiety tend to have high pain thresholds.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEConventional Syringelocal anesthesia was administered in first group using Conventional syringe
DEVICECamouflage Syringelocal anesthesia was administered in second group using Camouflage syringe

Timeline

Start date
2017-08-13
Primary completion
2017-08-27
Completion
2017-08-30
First posted
2018-06-25
Last updated
2018-10-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: India

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03566212. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Efficacy of Camouflaged Syringe vs Conventional Syringe (NCT03566212) · Clinical Trials Directory