Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03539588

Trigger Point Dry Needling vs Trigger Point Dry Needling With Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation

Trigger Point Dry Needling vs Trigger Point Dry Needling With Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Sub-acute and Chronic Low Back Pain in a Military Population: A Randomized Crossover Design

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30 (actual)
Sponsor
William Beaumont Army Medical Center · Federal
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

trigger point dry needling with intramuscular electrical stimulation vs trigger point dry needling

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if trigger point dry needling with intramuscular electrical stimulation is more effective in decreasing pain and disability in individuals with sub-acute and chronic low back pain (LBP) than with trigger point dry needling alone. The investigators are using a within subjects randomized crossover study that will recruit 30 active duty military personnel or beneficiaries from William Beaumont Army Medical Center and all associated clinics. The investigators hypothesize that individuals with LBP will exhibit larger improvements in pain and disability when receiving trigger point dry needling with intramuscular electrical stimulation than when receiving trigger point dry needling alone.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEtrigger point dry needlingplacement of the dry needle into the muscle tissue to elicit a local twitch response. Only MYOTECH dry needles and ESTIM II dual channel stimulator will be used in this study. However we are not studying the equipment.
DEVICEElectrical Stimulationuses the dry needles as nodes to stimulate muscular contraction. Only MYOTECH dry needles and ESTIM II dual channel stimulator will be used in this study. However we are not studying the equipment.

Timeline

Start date
2017-04-12
Primary completion
2017-11-13
Completion
2017-11-13
First posted
2018-05-29
Last updated
2018-05-29

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03539588. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.