Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Terminated

TerminatedNCT03535857

Effectiveness of Bilateral PTNS Compared to Unilateral PTNS for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder/Urge Incontinence

Status
Terminated
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36 (actual)
Sponsor
Gnankang Sarah Napoe · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years – 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study is designed to evaluate whether bilateral Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation is more effective than unilateral Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation at treating overactive bladder and urge urinary incontinence

Detailed description

Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is an accepted treatment for overactive bladder that can be accomplished in the office with minimal side effects. It is currently carried out by stimulating one of the posterior tibial nerves unilaterally. The aim of this study is to determine whether bilateral percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is more effective than unilateral stimulation. Patients with a diagnosis of overactive bladder who have previously failed lifestyle changes and/or pharmacologic therapy will be offered percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. Enrolled patients will be randomized into two groups. The control group will receive the traditional unilateral treatment of PTNS. The intervention group will receive bilateral PTNS treatment. Intervention success will be measured by improvement in overactive bladder symptoms assessed by improvement in the scores on the overactive bladder questionnaire symptoms bother and decrease in number of voids, nocturia episodes and incontinence episodes as reported in the voiding diary

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEPTNSUse of PTNS on the ankle for 30 minutes

Timeline

Start date
2018-04-17
Primary completion
2023-09-08
Completion
2023-09-08
First posted
2018-05-24
Last updated
2025-04-15
Results posted
2025-04-06

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: United States

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03535857. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.