NCT03533309

Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Ridge Splitting of Horizontal Deficient in Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Ridge

Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Ridge Splitting of Horizontal Deficient in Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Ridge (Randomized Clinical Trial)

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 14 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Cairo University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 16 Years – 55 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

In patient with horizontal deficiency in alveolar ridge of the anterior maxilla, Dose computer Guided stent enhance the accuracy and clinical outcome vs conventional ridge splitting surgery????

Detailed description

PICO P- Horizontal deficient alveolar ridge in Anterior Maxillary Region I- Computer guided surgical cutting guide C- Conventional alveolar ridge splitting O- Clinical outcome and radiographic outcomes Primary outcome: Accuracy In computer Guided: CBCT will performed pre-operative and post-operative for measure the difference of degree in superimposition after ridge splitting. In conventional method: Ridge mapping will applied in preoperative clinical evaluation, and measure in post-operative, the difference in splitting will calculate in millimeter (mm) Secondary outcome: Thickness of buccal cortical plate In both technique CBCT will performed and measuring the Both Buccal and palatal cortical bone in millimeter(mm)

Conditions

• Ridge Deficency

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Computer guided surgical cutting guide	comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using computer guided surgical cutting stent
PROCEDURE	Conventional alveolar ridge splitting	comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using conventional technique.

Timeline

• Start date: 2018-07-01
• Primary completion: 2019-07-30
• Completion: 2019-10-30
• First posted: 2018-05-23
• Last updated: 2018-05-24