Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT03524209

CORset Versus OstéoSynthese in Adult Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis

Comparison of Thoracolumbar Back Pain After Brace Treatment Versus Percutaneous Instrumentation in Adult Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis Combined With Antibiotic Treatment

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150 (estimated)
Sponsor
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Pyogenic spondylitis in adults is usually treated by antibiotics according to bacteria evidenced in a diagnostic intervertebral disc puncture. Brace treatment is associated in patients presenting back pain and a risk for vertebral body collapse due to infection with subsequent kyphotic deformity of the thoracolumbar spine. Percutaneous minimally invasive posterior spinal instrumentation has evolved over the last decade and indications in infections arouse over the last years. This procedure is interesting as it is performed through small skin incisions only. It avoids paravertebral muscle dissection and thus limits intraoperative bleeding and access morbidity. Recent retrospective data suggests that this internal fixation represents a theoretical advantage over brace treatment by lowering back pain and increasing patient's quality of life in the short run, up to 3 months, but no randomized study was published. The patient's autonomy, including walking ability and daily activities, might improve more rapidly after a percutaneous procedure. Additionally, the sagittal alignment of the thoracolumbar spine could be better maintained by internal fixation, which might prevent progression into kyphosis and improve long-term outcome. The hypothesis is the superiority of percutaneous minimally invasive instrumentation on brace treatment in term of quality of life, back pain and quality of osseous healing.

Detailed description

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous for the indication of pyogenic spondylitis has been demonstrated retrospectively on small cohort studies, which is in line with our clinical experience. Although this therapeutic concept seems applicable to patients with spondylitis, the theoretical clinical benefit of minimally invasive surgery remains hypothetic and unclear compared to brace treatment, which might still be regarded as the gold standard.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEPercutaneous instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spineThe spine is stabilized cranially and caudally of the level of spondylodiscitis. The percutaneous instrumentation consists of a rod and pedicle screw construct. The vertebrae are instrumented through minimal skin incisions using a fluoroscopic guidance or a spinal navigation system based on 3D imaging.
OTHERBraceBrace treatment is associated in patients presenting back pain and a risk for vertebral body collapse due to infection with subsequent kyphotic deformity of the thoracolumbar spine

Timeline

Start date
2019-08-21
Primary completion
2024-12-01
Completion
2024-12-01
First posted
2018-05-14
Last updated
2022-06-30

Locations

15 sites across 1 country: France

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03524209. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.