Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT03521024

Effect of Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on Esthetics

Evaluation of Esthetic and Biomechanical Outcome of Maxillary Anterior Single-Tooth Zirconia Implant Supported PEKK Crowns Versus Lithium Disilicate Crowns on PEKK Abutments: Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10 (estimated)
Sponsor
Cairo University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

aim of study is to evaluate esthetic and biomechanical outcome of maxillary anterior single-tooth zirconia implant supported PEKK crowns compared to lithium disilicate crowns on PEKK abutments .

Detailed description

High performance polymers may be a valid alternative to other conventional materials for abutments and crowns over zirconia implants because of their cushioning effect and elastic modulus (5.1GPa), which absorb occlusal forces and avoid overload of the underlying bone from the direct transmission of biting impacts ; which could optimize and preserve osseointegration with time. Zirconia implants with high performance polymers restorations can be considered a good alternative for replacing natural teeth. For many years lithium disilicate has been the esthetics standard used in Veneers ,Inlays , onlays, occlusal veneers, partial crowns,minimally invasive crowns and Implant superstructures due to its natural-looking tooth colouring and excellent light-optical properties. Due to the promising esthetics of high performance polymers as it can be veneered with different veneering materials it would successfully restore esthetics.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERpoly ether ketone ketonePolyetherketoneketone (PEKK) forms a group of high-performance thermoplastic polymers. PEKK shows excellent biocompatibility and exhibits outstanding properties such as high wear resistance and high compressive (246 MPa), flexural (5.0GPa), and tensile strengths (115 MPa). The material is lightweight, allows shock absorption, and can be veneered with various commercially available dental materials
OTHERlithium disilicatewell documented in the literatures as successful restoration modality.

Timeline

Start date
2018-09-15
Primary completion
2019-06-15
Completion
2019-09-15
First posted
2018-05-11
Last updated
2018-05-11

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03521024. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.