Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03514706

Effect of PCV and VCV on Extravascular Lung Water

The Ultrasound Estimation of Extravascular Lung Water in Volume Controlled Versus Pressure Controlled Ventilation After One Lung Ventilation in Thoracoscopic Surgery. A Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50 (actual)
Sponsor
Cairo University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Volume controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) are the common ventilatory modes during OLV undergoing thoracic surgery. A controversy regarding which ventilation mode is better for oxygenation during OLV with PCV enhances oxygenation more than VCV ;given its initial high peak inspiratory flow rates and its rapidly decelerating flow pattern. However, this high peak inspiratory flow rate might also provoke lung injury via shearing and traction forces on the alveoli. Extravascular lung water describes water within the lungs but outside pulmonary vasculature. Lung ultrasound (LUS) assessment of EVLW by B-lines provides a reliable and easy alternative.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTvolume controlled ventilationLung ultrasound (LUS) will be performed with a 2-4 MHz phased array probe. Patients will be scanned in supine position by a recording 5 seconds videos. LUS will be assessed for the presence of B lines. The sum of lung comets produces a score reflecting the extent of lung water accumulation. LUS will be obtained by scanning 12-rib interspaces. The sum of B-lines on each scanning site yields a score from 0 to 36
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTpressure controlled ventilationLung ultrasound (LUS) will be performed with a 2-4 MHz phased array probe. Patients will be scanned in supine position by a recording 5 seconds videos. LUS will be assessed for the presence of B lines. The sum of lung comets produces a score reflecting the extent of lung water accumulation. LUS will be obtained by scanning 12-rib interspaces. The sum of B-lines on each scanning site yields a score from 0 to 36

Timeline

Start date
2018-03-01
Primary completion
2019-01-01
Completion
2019-03-01
First posted
2018-05-02
Last updated
2019-03-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03514706. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.