Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03511612
Comparison of the Ankle-Brachial Index Measurement Using a Specific Oscillometric Device vs. the Doppler Method
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 51 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Limoges · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 60 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Several methods are available to measure ankle brachial index (ABI) non-invasively. A recent scientific statement of the AHA considers the Doppler method as the reference. However because Doppler devices are not widely available in primary care, several attempts have been made to propose alternative methods, among whom oscillometric methods (automatic blood pressure machines) have attracted most attention. We hypothesize that: \- the diagnostic characteristics (i.e. sensitivity, specificity and AUC) of the oscillometric method would be very good as compared to the Doppler method. the oscillometric method would have better intra- and inter-observer reproducibilities as compared to the Doppler method.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DIAGNOSTIC_TEST | Measure ankle brachial index (ABI) | This is a head-to-head comparison of 2 methods of determination of the ABI, taking the Doppler method as the standard and the oscillometric device AVP as the challenger |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-04-24
- Primary completion
- 2018-10-24
- Completion
- 2018-10-24
- First posted
- 2018-04-30
- Last updated
- 2025-08-01
Locations
1 site across 1 country: France
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03511612. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.