Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03511612

Comparison of the Ankle-Brachial Index Measurement Using a Specific Oscillometric Device vs. the Doppler Method

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51 (actual)
Sponsor
University Hospital, Limoges · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Several methods are available to measure ankle brachial index (ABI) non-invasively. A recent scientific statement of the AHA considers the Doppler method as the reference. However because Doppler devices are not widely available in primary care, several attempts have been made to propose alternative methods, among whom oscillometric methods (automatic blood pressure machines) have attracted most attention. We hypothesize that: \- the diagnostic characteristics (i.e. sensitivity, specificity and AUC) of the oscillometric method would be very good as compared to the Doppler method. the oscillometric method would have better intra- and inter-observer reproducibilities as compared to the Doppler method.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTMeasure ankle brachial index (ABI)This is a head-to-head comparison of 2 methods of determination of the ABI, taking the Doppler method as the standard and the oscillometric device AVP as the challenger

Timeline

Start date
2018-04-24
Primary completion
2018-10-24
Completion
2018-10-24
First posted
2018-04-30
Last updated
2025-08-01

Locations

1 site across 1 country: France

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03511612. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.