Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03497403
Socket Preservation Procedure Studying Soft and Hard Tissue Outcomes
Socket Preservation Revisited: RCT to Study the Three-dimensional Changes of Hard and Soft Tissue Comparing Two Distinct Surgical Protocols
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 30 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Harvard School of Dental Medicine · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Two different surgical protocols for socket preservation were compared. Soft and hard tissue outcomes were measured clinically and radiographically at baseline and six months post operatively.
Detailed description
The effect of different surgical techniques for socket preservation on soft tissue parameters has seldom been investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate One with a cross-linked membrane used in secondary intention healing and the other with a non-cross-linked membrane used in primary intentional healing. Thirty subjects requiring tooth extraction were randomly allocated to either control group C (allograft covered with a non-cross-linked collagen membrane with primary closure) or experimental group E (allograft covered with cross-linked collagen membrane left exposed). Sites were surgically re-entered at 6-months. Soft and hard tissue measurements, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and cast measurements were taken at baseline \& 6-months.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Socket preservation control | After a tooth was extracted, the adjacent gum tissue was fully reflected, bone graft (FDBA) and non-cross-linked barrier membrane (Bio-Gide) were applied to the defect. The site was stabilized with sutures. Patients were followed for 6 months post operatively. |
| PROCEDURE | Socket preservation experimental | After a tooth was extracted, the adjacent gum tissue was minimally reflected, bone graft (FDBA) and cross-linked barrier membrane (OssixPlus) were applied to the defect. The site was stabilized with sutures. Patients were followed for 6 months post operatively. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2016-10-18
- Primary completion
- 2017-04-19
- Completion
- 2017-09-29
- First posted
- 2018-04-13
- Last updated
- 2018-04-13
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03497403. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.