Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03494582
Abdominal Versus Vaginal Hysteropexy
Trans Vaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy for the Management of Uterine Prolapse
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 53 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Ain Shams Maternity Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 20 Years – 40 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study will compare the vaginal versus the abdominal approach for the management of uterine prolapse
Detailed description
this study compares The unilateral sacrospinous hysteropexy with prolene sutures versus the abdominal sacral hysteropexy using Mersilene suture for the management of uterine prolapse
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Sacral Hysteropexy | Abdominal approach for uterine suspension |
| PROCEDURE | sacrospinous Hysteropexy | Transvaginal approach for uterine suspension |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-04-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-10-01
- Completion
- 2018-12-01
- First posted
- 2018-04-11
- Last updated
- 2018-12-03
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03494582. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.