NCT03448562

CPVI Alone Versus. CPVI Plus Electrophysiological Substrate Ablation in the LA During SR for the Treatment of Non-PAF

Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone Versus. Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Plus Electrophysiological Substrate Ablation in the Left Atrium During Sinus Rhythm for the Treatment of Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 300 (estimated)
• Sponsor: The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 80 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The primary objective of this investigation is to compare the efficacy of two different AF ablation strategies in patients with non-paroxysmal AF: CPVI plus electrophysiologic substrate ablation in the left atrium during sinus rhythm (STABLE-SR) and CPVI alone.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac rhythm disorder, which affects patients' morbidity and mortality. AF ablation has emerged as a promising treatment strategy, offering the possibility of a durable treatment. Currently, there is no general agreement regarding NPAF ablation strategy. Obviously, pulmonary vein isolation is the corner stone for all types of AF ablation. The consensus is that CPVI alone is insufficient for NPAF ablation. However, the recent clinical trials did not show the additional benefits of other substrate modification strategies. Furthermore, the widely used cryo-ablation dilutes the concept that NPAF needs additional substrate modification to further improve the clinical outcome. It seems that CPVI only as the optimal strategy is more commonly accepted for NPAF patients in most of the centers. Based on the results from our pilot study and STABLE-SR trial, we believe that fibrotic substrate modification beyond CPVI is very promising for NPAF ablation, but its superiority over CPVI alone needs a large scaled randomized trial to prove. AIM OF THE STUDY: The primary objective of this investigation is to compare the efficacy of two different AF ablation strategies in patients with non-paroxysmal AF: CPVI plus electrophysiologic substrate ablation in the left atrium during sinus rhythm (STABLE-SR) and CPVI alone. The primary endpoint is freedom from AF and/or ATs with or without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) at 12months after a single-ablation procedure. AF and/or AT occurring in the first 3 months after the ablation (blanking period) was censored. Each episode lasts \> 30 seconds. The secondary endpoint are incidence of peri-procedural complications, including stroke, PV stenosis, cardiac perforation, esophageal injury and death; procedure time; fluoroscopy time (including the total fluoroscopy time, during CPVI and after CPVI); the occurrence of the conversion from AF to AT, and its relationship with long-term outcome; the relationship between acute termination of AF and long term outcome. STUDY DESIGN: This is a randomized, prospective, parallel, single-blind multicenter design. The enrollment target for this investigation is 300 patients. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 fashion into one of the investigation arms: CPVI plus electrophysiologic substrate ablation in the left atrium during sinus rhythm (STABLE-SR) and CPVI alone. Follow-up for these patients includes visits at 3 m, 6 m, 9 m, 12 m.

Conditions

• Atrial Fibrillation

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	CPVI	ablate around the pulmonary vein orifice
PROCEDURE	STABLE-SR	homogenization of the low voltage zones and elimination of the complex electrograms from the transitional zones during sinus rhythm

Timeline

• Start date: 2018-04-01
• Primary completion: 2020-09-30
• Completion: 2020-09-30
• First posted: 2018-02-28
• Last updated: 2020-02-11

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China