NCT03415516

Clinical Comparison of Universal Adhesives in Terms of Different Application Modes on the Restoration of NCCLs

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 20 (actual)
• Sponsor: Hacettepe University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 65 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The aim of this randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial is to evaluate the performances of two different universal adhesives and an etch\&rinse adhesive in restoration of non-caries cervical lesions. Twenty patients will receive restorations. Lesions will be divided into 7 groups according to adhesive systems and application modes: GSE: Gluma Universal- self etch, GSL: Gluma Universal-selective etching, GER: Gluma Universal-etch\&rinse, ASE: All Bond Universal- self etch, ASL: All Bond Universal- selective etching, AER: All Bond Universal- etch\&rinse, SB (Control): Single Bond2+etch\&rinse. Restorations (nano-hybrid composite) will be scored with regard to retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, recurrent caries and post operative sensitivity using modified USPHS criteria after 48 months. Two examiners who is not involved in the placement of restorations will conduct the evaluations. Descriptive statistics will be performed using Chi-square tests.

Conditions

• Tooth Wear

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Gluma Universal	Adhesive systems
DEVICE	All Bond Universal	Adhesive systems
DRUG	Single Bond2	Adhesive systems

Timeline

• Start date: 2015-07-01
• Primary completion: 2015-11-01
• Completion: 2018-11-01
• First posted: 2018-01-30
• Last updated: 2021-09-14