Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03412032
Comparison of Two Summative Assessment Methods in Advanced Life Support Courses
Comparison of Two Summative Assessment Methods in Advanced Life Support Courses - a Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 428 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Several approaches for summative assessment during Advanced Life Support courses are used. The most commonly used method during European Resuscitation (ERC) Council Life Support Courses is that 1 instructor is miming a whole team, and the candidate has to lead this "team" through a scenario; another variant of the summative assessment (mainly used by American Heart Association (AHA) Courses) is with a group of students, where one student is the team leader to be assessed and the others are his team not being assessed. The second approach might be more realistic; however there is no evidence around with regard to effectiveness (pass/fail rate, ability to test non-technical skills (NTS)) or participant/assessor satisfaction.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | assessment | different assessments in both arms |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-12-02
- Primary completion
- 2019-06-30
- Completion
- 2019-12-31
- First posted
- 2018-01-26
- Last updated
- 2020-02-05
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Switzerland
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03412032. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.