Trials / Active Not Recruiting
Active Not RecruitingNCT03394079
Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
A Prospective, Open Label, Multi-center, Dual Arm, Randomized, Pragmatic Trial : Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Status
- Active Not Recruiting
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 2,008 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Seung-Jung Park · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 19 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The primary aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of OCT-guided(optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided) and IVUS-guided(Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided) strategies in patients undergoing Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-coated balloons (only for in-stent restenosis) for significant obstructive Coronary artery disease (CAD). The investigators hypothesize that OCT-guided PCI is non-inferior to IVUS-guided PCI with respect to primary end point of target-vessel failure (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction \[MI\], or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization \[TVR\]) at 1 year after randomization.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | PCI | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-04-12
- Primary completion
- 2023-02-17
- Completion
- 2027-01-31
- First posted
- 2018-01-09
- Last updated
- 2026-01-02
Locations
9 sites across 1 country: South Korea
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03394079. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.