Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03377894
Sharp Versus Blunt Uterine Incision Expansion
Comparison Between Blunt Versus Sharp Expansion of Uterine Incision at Lower Segment Cesarean Section as Regards the Intra-operative Blood Loss & Postoperative Pain
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 2 / Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 200 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Kasr El Aini Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 20 Years – 37 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
comparison between blunt versus sharp expansion of uterine incision at lower segment cesarean section in primigravida as regards the intra-operative blood loss \& postoperative pain
Detailed description
the study includes 200 pregnant women, primigravidas, at term who underwent elective transverse lower segment Cesarean section for the first time among the age group of 20 - 37 years with a singleton pregnancy. The patients are divided randomly into two groups as follows: * Group (A): undergoing blunt uterine incision expansion * Group (B): undergoing sharp uterine incision expansion
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | blunt uterine incision expansion | blunt uterine incision expansion |
| PROCEDURE | sharp uterine incision expansion | sharp uterine incision expansion |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-03-01
- Completion
- 2018-03-01
- First posted
- 2017-12-19
- Last updated
- 2017-12-19
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03377894. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.