Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT03377894

Sharp Versus Blunt Uterine Incision Expansion

Comparison Between Blunt Versus Sharp Expansion of Uterine Incision at Lower Segment Cesarean Section as Regards the Intra-operative Blood Loss & Postoperative Pain

Status
Unknown
Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200 (estimated)
Sponsor
Kasr El Aini Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
20 Years – 37 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

comparison between blunt versus sharp expansion of uterine incision at lower segment cesarean section in primigravida as regards the intra-operative blood loss \& postoperative pain

Detailed description

the study includes 200 pregnant women, primigravidas, at term who underwent elective transverse lower segment Cesarean section for the first time among the age group of 20 - 37 years with a singleton pregnancy. The patients are divided randomly into two groups as follows: * Group (A): undergoing blunt uterine incision expansion * Group (B): undergoing sharp uterine incision expansion

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREblunt uterine incision expansionblunt uterine incision expansion
PROCEDUREsharp uterine incision expansionsharp uterine incision expansion

Timeline

Start date
2017-12-01
Primary completion
2018-03-01
Completion
2018-03-01
First posted
2017-12-19
Last updated
2017-12-19

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03377894. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.