Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03376048

Local Wound Infiltration Plus TAP Block Versus Local Wound Infiltration Only

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Local Wound Infiltration Plus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Local Wound Infiltration Only After Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: a Randomized, Double-blind, Non-inferiority Trial

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108 (actual)
Sponsor
Kyungpook National University Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The TAP block is typically performed either with ultrasound guidance (TAP-US) or laparoscopic visualization (TAP-LAP): comparison between these two technics showed no differences in pain control and use of opioid analgesics. The investigators hypothesize that WI is non-inferior to WI + TAP-block with respect to postoperative pain.

Detailed description

In colorectal surgery, laparoscopy and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have significantly improved the short-term outcomes (1). Although the laparoscopic approach reduces pain and recovery time, post-operative pain, nausea and vomiting still represent an issue. In order to reduce opioid related side effects, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), constipation and prolonged post-operative ileus, non-opioid based multimodal analgesia have been recently introduced. Although epidural analgesia has gained good success, it does not seem to offer any additional clinical benefits to patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared to alternative analgesic technique within an ERAS program. Both local wound infiltration (WI) and TAP block are common techniques in multimodal postoperative pain treatment, and their association allows to achieve pain control despite a reduced use of opioid analgesics. Furthermore, in a recent single-blind prospective study TAP block resulted superior to wound infiltration alone. The TAP block is typically performed either with ultrasound guidance (TAP-US) or laparoscopic visualization (TAP-LAP): comparison between these two technics showed no differences in pain control and use of opioid analgesics. The aim of this study is to compare WI + TAP-LAP versus WI alone. The investigators hypothesize that WI is non-inferior to WI + TAP-block with respect to postoperative pain.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREWound infiltration plus TAP1. TAP block: At the beginning of the main surgical procedure the surgeon will perform a TAP with ropivacaine infiltration, bilaterally in the anterior axillary line, between the costal margin and iliac crest in the intermuscular plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles, the anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance, the surgeon under laparoscopic guidance (two "pops" technique). 2. Wound infiltration : Wound infiltration of ropivacaine will be performed by the surgeon before skin incision.
PROCEDUREWound infiltrationWound infiltration of ropivacaine will be performed by the surgeon before skin incision.

Timeline

Start date
2017-12-20
Primary completion
2019-04-30
Completion
2019-12-30
First posted
2017-12-18
Last updated
2020-02-05

Locations

2 sites across 2 countries: Italy, South Korea

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03376048. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.