Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03373136

Compare Bleeding Risk Between Cold and Hot Snaring Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyp: a Randomized Control Trial

Comparison of the Bleeding Risk Between Cold and Hot Snaring Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyp: a Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4,270 (actual)
Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

In this randomized control trial the investigators aim to compare the bleeding complication between cold snaring and hot snaring polypectomy with a large sample size.

Detailed description

The investigators will enroll subjects who receive screening or surveillance colonoscopy with small colorectal polyp, 4 to10 mm in size, from multiple centers in Taiwan. Subjects who are less than 40 years old and has contraindication will be excluded from this study. All the candidates for enrollment will sign the inform consent at the outpatient clinic. Once the candidate has the target lesion, polyp sized 4 to 10 mm, at colonoscopy will be randomized into either cold snaring or hot snaring polypectomy group. In the group with cold snaring, polypectomy will be done without electrocautery. In the hot snaring group, the polypectomy will be performed with electrocautery. The bowel preparation and colonoscopy insertion are the same in both groups as conventional colonoscopy method. The colonoscopy will be performed by experienced endoscopies who performed more than 100 polypectomies per year.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEPolypectomyPolypectomy during colonoscopy is considered effective to reduce the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer

Timeline

Start date
2018-02-07
Primary completion
2020-08-14
Completion
2020-08-30
First posted
2017-12-14
Last updated
2020-10-14

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Taiwan

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03373136. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.