Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT03352999

Cardiac Arrest Extra Corporeal Oxygenation Membrane

Refractory Cardiac Arrest Management With Veno-Arterial Extra Corporeal Oxygenation Membrane Registry

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50 (estimated)
Sponsor
Central Hospital, Nancy, France · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

French guidelines for Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) consider Extra-Corporeal Life Support (ECLS) as one option in Refractory out-of hospital Cardiac Arrest (ROHCA) patients with a no-flow less than five minutes and absence of spontaneous circulation 30 minutes after initiation of advanced CPR. Duration of both pre-CPR arrest (no-flow) and of CPR (low-flow) have been systematically highlighted as crucial prognostic factors in all observational studies focused on ROHCA. In order to shorten the time to ECLS initiation, the most recent European Resuscitation Council guidelines recommend, in eligible ROHCA patients, a fast track access to ECLS implantation. CHRU Nancy elaborated an operational strategy which was designed to improve the enrolment of eligible ROHCA patients and to reduce the delay time between recognition and ECLS initiation. The objective of the present register was to assess prospectively the impact of this new operational strategy over a 5 years period.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREFast track access to vaECMOROHCA must be witnessed with onset of bystander CPR and an immediate call to Emergency Dispatch. Furthermore, to minimize any loss of time, all qualified geographical locations are directly incorporated in the regulation software of the center for medical emergency control. Patients suitable for vaECMO implantation were identified as early as possible by the Medical Dispatcher at the Emergency Call Dispatch Center. Bystanders pursued CPR until Mobile Intensive Care Unit (MICU) arrival. OHCA was considered refractory after 10 min of CPR initiating the transport by MICU to the hospital such that the vaECMO intervention could be performed. The resuscitation was pursued during the transfer to hospital. An automated chest compression device was used in order to minimize interruption periods. The intensivists and cardiac surgeons stood ready to implant the vaECMO surgically in the catheterization laboratory where a percutaneous coronary intervention was subsequently performed.

Timeline

Start date
2017-12-01
Primary completion
2022-12-01
Completion
2023-12-01
First posted
2017-11-24
Last updated
2017-11-24

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03352999. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.