NCT03328442

Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Using VISTA Technique Compared to MCAF Technique With PRF.

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Procedure Using VISTA Technique Compared to Modified Coronally Advanced Flap Technique in Conjunction With Platelet Rich Fibrin-membrane.

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 16 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Cairo University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 55 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

VISTA technique with PRF compared to MCAF technique with PRF to treat gingival recession

Detailed description

Comparison between two techniques for root coverage divided in two groups the first (test group) VISTA technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane and the second (control group)MCAF technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane for treating Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects. Clinical Periodontal Records will be taken at baseline, 3 months and 6 months respectively. Visual analogue scale for pain during one week after operation. Patient satisfaction record using questionnaire after 6 months.

Conditions

• Gingival Recession

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	VISTA Technique	VISTA with PRF membrane includes Treatment of recession class I and II using autologous PRF membrane
PROCEDURE	modified coronally advanced flap	modified coronally advanced flap with PRF membrane for Treatment of recession class I and II

Timeline

• Start date: 2018-03-01
• Primary completion: 2020-02-01
• Completion: 2020-03-01
• First posted: 2017-11-01
• Last updated: 2018-01-17