Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03314519

Lung Ultrasonography vs Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy for Aiding Lung Collapse in Patient Using Double Lumen Tube

A Randomized Controlled Study Compare Lung Ultrasonography to Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Confirming Double Lumen Tube Positioning for Thoracic Surgery.

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200 (actual)
Sponsor
Mahidol University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The study contains the result from a comparison of diagnostic outcomes about lung collapse by using lung ultrasonography as a new diagnostic test compares to fiberoptic bronchoscopy as the standard test.

Detailed description

The study contains the result from a comparison of diagnostic outcomes about lung collapse by using lung ultrasonography as a new diagnostic test compares to fiberoptic bronchoscopy as a standard test. Both of them detect lung collapse reported as surgical grading lung collapse by the thoracic surgeons. The protocol was performed in a randomized controlled trial whether the subject was allocated to the ultrasonography group or the fiberoptic bronchoscopy group.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTLung ultrasonography by experienced anaesthesiologistUse ultrasound image of lung at upper and lower lobe to detect lung collapse and compare grading of lung collapse by surgeon as gold standard
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTFiberoptic bronchoscopy for double lumen tube's positionUse fiberoptic bronchoscope via double lumen tube to detect optimum position of double lumen tube and record grading of lung collapse by surgeon as gold standard

Timeline

Start date
2017-10-20
Primary completion
2019-07-10
Completion
2019-07-31
First posted
2017-10-19
Last updated
2020-03-12
Results posted
2020-03-12

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Thailand

Regulatory

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03314519. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.