Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT03306238

LAParoscopic Entry Technique in REnal Surgery

Laparoscopic Entry Technique in Renal Surgery: a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Open (Hasson) Versus Closed (Veress) Techniques.

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300 (estimated)
Sponsor
The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, incorporating The National Children's Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This is a randomised controlled trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of two different port site entry techniques in laparoscopic renal surgery: open method (Hasson) and closed method (Veress). It will involve 300 adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic renal surgery in Tallaght hospital under two Consultant urologists.

Detailed description

Surgical specialties commonly using laparoscopic techniques like gynecology and general surgery have extensively compared the various available techniques of port insertion (1). There is very little known regarding the safest entry technique for the initial port in laparoscopic renal surgery. Results from other surgical specialties cannot simply be extrapolated to this type of laparoscopic surgery due to difference in entry site and patient position with renal surgery. Hence, this randomised controlled trial will be performed in a urological unit with two laparoscopic renal surgeons to compare two commonly used techniques of initial trocar insertion: the closed method and the open method. Background Since its introduction in 1991 by Clayman, laparoscopic renal surgery has become very popular and is widely used for both benign and malignant renal operations such as radical, simple and partial nephrectomies, pyeloplasties, nephro-ureterectomies (2). The overall reported major and minor complication rate of laparoscopic renal surgery is 9.5% and 1.9% respectively (2). Initial entry by trocar insertion is the most hazardous part of the laparoscopic procedure. Opinion regarding the safest entry technique is divided. The two most commonly used techniques of port entry include open and closed (3). An open technique, as first described by Hasson, involves the peritoneum being cut down, followed by the insertion of a blunt trocar under direct visualisation, gas insufflation, and insertion of the laparoscope. One of the closed technique involves the insertion of a Veress needle (a needle equipped with a spring-loaded obturator) into the peritoneal cavity, followed by gas insufflation (act of blowing) and insertion of a trocar (a sharp, pointed instrument with a cannula used to enter the body cavity). Finally the laparoscope is passed through the trocar once the obturator is removed. Previous meta-analyses in laparoscopic surgery from gynaecological and general surgical operations have not been able to support one technique over the other due to insufficient evidence.to our knowledge (3), there are no randomised controlled trials comparing these two techniques in laparoscopic renal surgery. During laparoscopic renal surgery, the patient is placed in a lateral flank position with the table flexed. The initial port of entry can be either at the umbilicus or lateral to it. This position is unique to urological surgery and hence can have different implications to the initial trocar insertion technique. The objective is to compare the open method (Hasson) and closed method (Veress) of laparoscopic port site entry in renal surgery

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREOpen approach to port insertionThis involves the peritoneum being cut down, followed by the insertion of a blunt trocar under direct visualisation, gas insufflation, and insertion of the laparoscope
PROCEDUREClosed approach to port insertionThis involves the insertion of a Veress needle (a needle equipped with a spring-loaded obturator) into the peritoneal cavity, followed by gas insufflation (act of blowing) and insertion of a trocar (a sharp, pointed instrument with a cannula used to enter the body cavity).

Timeline

Start date
2017-11-01
Primary completion
2019-10-01
Completion
2019-12-31
First posted
2017-10-11
Last updated
2017-12-21

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Ireland

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03306238. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.