Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03285360
Effectiveness of Bioactiveglass Air Abrasion Versus Fluoride Varnish in Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity
Effectiveness of Sylc Air Abrasion Bioactive Glass Technology Versus Fluoride Varnish Application in Management of Hypersensitivity of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 50 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Cairo University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Will the use of Bioactive glass with air abrasion technology (Sylc) compared to Fluoride Varnish (Biflourid 10) affects the degree of pain in patients complaining from hypersensitivity due to non-carious lesions?
Detailed description
* Population: Patients complaining from Dentin Hypersensitivity due to non-carious lesions. * Intervention: Sylc, Air Abrasion Bioactive glass (Denfotex Research Ltd.) * Comparison: BiFlourid 10, Fluoride Varnish (VOCO, Germany) * Outcome measures: Dentin Hypersensitivity Outcome name Measuring device Measuring unit Dentin Hypersensitivity * Thermal * Tactile * Evaporative
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| COMBINATION_PRODUCT | Sylc | a dry powder (calcium sodium phosphosilicate), based on NovaMin powder. Bottle of small and coarse particles will be used for the treatment |
| COMBINATION_PRODUCT | fluoride varnish (Bifluorid 10) | It is a rapid- drying suspension of equal amounts of sodium fluoride and calcium fluoride. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-12-01
- Completion
- 2019-01-01
- First posted
- 2017-09-18
- Last updated
- 2019-01-31
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03285360. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.