Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03271060
Comparative Study Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion(PLIF) and Intertransverse Process Fusion in Treatment of Spodylolithesis
Comparative Study Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion(PLF) and Intertransverse Process Fusion in Treatment of Spodylolithesis
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 30 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Assiut University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The first technique described for interbody fusion was the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).(20) For this technique, the intervertebral disc is accessed through a retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach. While the posterior approach was first described by Russell Hibbs in 1911, in the 1950's, Cloward (7)popularized the posterior approach for a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).
Detailed description
In this study we will try to identify the benefits and outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and inter transverse process bone graft fusion.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Posterior lumbar interbody fusion | Lumbar fusion by screws and inter vertebral cage |
| PROCEDURE | Inter transverse bone grafting | Inter transverse process bone grafting by bone graft from illiac crest or other sites |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-08-30
- Completion
- 2019-09-01
- First posted
- 2017-09-01
- Last updated
- 2017-09-01
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03271060. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.