NCT03271008

Comparison of the Vividtrac™ and Other Videolaryngoscopes in Clinical Practice

Comparison of Necessary Time for Successful Intubation With the Vividtrac™ and KingVision™ Videolaryngoscopes and Macintosh Blade Direct Laryngoscopy in Clinical Practice

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 150 (estimated)
• Sponsor: University of Pecs · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Comparison of various videolaryngoscope devices (Vividtrac™ and KingVision™) and direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh blade regarding laryngoscopy time, intubation time, intubation success rate, percentage of visible glottic opening (POGO score) in elective and acute clinical anaesthesiology practice.

Conditions

• Intubation;Difficult

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Direct laryngoscopy	During the induction of general anaesthesia, the first attempt to achieve a secured airway is carried out using a size 4 (or size 3 if necessary) Macintosh blade direct laryngoscope.
DEVICE	Vividtrac videolaryngoscope	During the induction of general anaesthesia, the first attempt to achieve a secured airway is carried out using a Vividtrac videolaryngoscope connected to a tablet or smartphone.
DEVICE	KingVision videolaryngoscope	During the induction of general anaesthesia, the first attempt to achieve a secured airway is carried out using a KingVision videolaryngoscope.

Timeline

• Start date: 2017-01-01
• Primary completion: 2018-07-01
• Completion: 2018-07-01
• First posted: 2017-09-01
• Last updated: 2017-09-01

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Hungary