Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03233815
Benefits of Total Intravenous Anesthesia Compared With Inhaled Anesthesia in Cardiovascular Surgery
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 40 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 40 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study compares the difference in proinflammatory markers Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and cortisol in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery to asses if there is a benefit of using intravenous total anesthesia (TIVA) over inhaled anesthesia for this procedures.
Detailed description
IL-6, TNFα and cortisol will be measure at the beginning of the cardiovascular surgery and 20 minutes after the cardiovascular bypass ends to calculate the difference between them and compare if there is any statistical difference between the proinflammatory markers with the two anesthesia techniques.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Propofol | Propofol anesthesia Dose: 4-6mg/kg/h |
| DRUG | Sevoflurane | Inhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane. Dose: 1-2.5 Minimum Alveolar Concentration(MAC) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-11-13
- Primary completion
- 2021-12-01
- Completion
- 2021-12-01
- First posted
- 2017-07-31
- Last updated
- 2020-08-06
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Mexico
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03233815. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.