Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03230422
A Comparison of Video Laryngoscopes and the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway.
A Comparison of the Novel King Vision Pediatric aBlade and the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope to the Direct Laryngoscope in Simulated Normal and Difficult Infant Airway. A Bicentric, Prospective, Randomized Manikin Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 80 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
In Pediatric both manikin and human studies have suggested that the video laryngoscopy is equally suitable to facilitate intubation compared to the direct laryngoscopy.
Detailed description
The King Vision Pediatric aBlade is a novel video laryngoscopy for securing the airway of new born and infants. In this manikin studie we want to compare different types of video laryngoscopes in a simulated normal and difficult infant airway.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | normal airway | The Time interval between the laryngoscope blade passing the teeth/gums to the announcing of the first ventilation was recorded as the time to ventilation with the Video laryngoscopy (VL) or conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL) |
| DEVICE | difficult airway | The Time interval between the laryngoscope blade passing the teeth/gums to the announcing of the first ventilation was recorded as the time to ventilation with the Video laryngoscopy (VL) or conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-07-24
- Primary completion
- 2017-07-31
- Completion
- 2017-09-27
- First posted
- 2017-07-26
- Last updated
- 2017-10-02
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Germany
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03230422. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.