Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT03229616

BUCY+VP-16 vs BUCY Conditioning Regimen for DLBCL Undergoing Auto-HSCT

Busulfan+ Cyclophosphamide+ Etoposide vs Busulfan+ Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Status
Unknown
Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
122 (estimated)
Sponsor
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
14 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BUCY+VP-16 and BUCY myeloablative conditioning regimens in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Detailed description

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT) is an effective therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).BuCY conditioning regimen is a conventional scheme for DLBCL patients undergoing auto-HSCT, but it has a high relapse rate. Etoposide (VP-16) is extensively used in chemotherapy regimen for refractory/relapsed lymphoma. Whether addition of VP-16 could reduce the relapse rate remains unclear.In this study, the safety and efficacy of BUCY+VP-16 and BUCY myeloablative conditioning regimens in DLBCL undergoing auto-HSCT are evaluated.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGBusulfan (BU)Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4.
DRUGCyclophosphamide (CY)Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.
DRUGEtoposide (VP-16)Etoposide was administered at 15 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.

Timeline

Start date
2017-07-05
Primary completion
2020-06-01
Completion
2020-06-01
First posted
2017-07-25
Last updated
2017-10-12

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03229616. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.