Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT03226977

Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation(NIPPV) vs Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation vs Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome:a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,000 (estimated)
Sponsor
Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
5 Minutes – 6 Hours
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

In the past, several studies have compared the effects between nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation(NIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP) on the incidence of intubation in preterm infants, and the results were inconsistent.The purpose of the present study was to compare NIPPV with NCPAP on the need for endotracheal ventilation and subsequent complications

Detailed description

To this day, early use of noninvasive respiratory support strategies has been suggested to be the most effective pathway to reduce those risks. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) are two widely used ways of noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infant. As compared with invasive ventilation, NCPAP reduces the risks abnormal neurodevelopment. However, there is only 60% success rate of avoiding intubation in the preterm neonate supported with NCPAP. Supplying with an intermittent peak pressure on NCPAP, NIPPV is considered as a strengthened version of NCPAP with increased flow delivery in the upper airway, increased minute volume and functional residual capacity and recruitment of collapsed alveoli, improved stability of the chest wall and reduced asynchrony of thoraco-abdominal movement,which have been proven to be crucial to decrease the incidences of invasive ventilation and death. However, studies have compared the effects between nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation(NIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP) on the incidence of intubation in preterm infants, and the results were inconsistent.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICENIPPVNIPPV is used as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome
DEVICENCPAPNCPAP is used as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Timeline

Start date
2017-08-01
Primary completion
2020-07-30
Completion
2020-07-30
First posted
2017-07-24
Last updated
2017-07-24

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03226977. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.