NCT03225495

Comparison Between Ultra-narrow Diameter Implants (2,75 mm) Without Bone Regeneration Versus Standard Diameter Implants (4,3 mm) in Combination With Bone Regeneration

Éxito a Corto Plazo de Los Implantes Ultra-estrechos (2,75 mm) en comparación Con Implantes de Plataforma Regular (4,3 mm) Que Requieren regeneración ósea Vestibular simultánea. Ensayo clínico Aleatorizado

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 40 (estimated)
• Sponsor: University of Barcelona · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The main target of the study is to compare ultra-narrow diameter implants (2.75 mm) without bone regeneration versus standard diameter implants (4.3 mm) in combination with bone regeneration. To do so, patients with missing upper central incisors, canines, first or second premolars with alveolar ridges of 6 - 8 mm of thickness will be restored with dental implants. Cone beam computed tomographic examination and clinical values will be registered before and after the surgical procedure at 6 and 12 months.

Conditions

• Dental Implant
• Narrow Implant
• Implant Fracture
• Guided Bone Regeneration

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Standard implant	Arm - Standard Implant: implant placement in combination with guided bone regeneration;
PROCEDURE	Ultra-narrow implant	Arm - Ultra-narrow implant: implant placement without guided bone regeneration

Timeline

• Start date: 2017-07-01
• Primary completion: 2018-07-01
• Completion: 2019-07-01
• First posted: 2017-07-21
• Last updated: 2018-01-17

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Spain