Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03200639
Cachexia in Gynecological Cancer and the Preventive Role of Weight Training
Comparison of High Intensity Interval Body Weight Training Versus Combined Training on Body Composition, Physical Function, Metabolic Risk and Inflammation in Postmenopausal Women With and Without Gynecological Cancer
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 38 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 50 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The study aim was to compare the effectiveness of combined training (CT; aerobic + resistance exercises) and high-intensity interval body weight training (HIITBW) on body composition, metabolic and inflammatory profile, physical function and quality of life in older women with gynecological and breast cancer and their pair-matched controls (older women with no cancer). The hypothesis of the present clinical trial is that HIITBW is effective as well as CT for improvements on body composition, metabolic and inflammatory profile, physical function and quality of life in older women with gynecological and breast cancer.
Detailed description
Physical training has been recommended to prevent or attenuation cachexia and sarcopenia in older people with or without cancer. The American College of Sports Medicine recommends 150 min of moderate intensity exercise combining aerobic exercise with resistance exercises, termed as combined training (CT). However, it has been reported that very low proportion (\<10%) of older adults meet the physical activity recommendation. Lack of time has been reported as a common reason to people not to do exercise. Thus, identifying effective physical training dosages and modalities which may be feasible are necessary for this population. Repeated brief bouts of fast and intense exercise interspersed with low intensity exercise termed as high intensity interval training (HIIT) has shown to be a time-effective strategy to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in young and older. Moreover, HIIT has shown to improve glycemic control in patients at high risk for TDM2, muscle mass, body fat and physical function. However, there were many pending issues involving the HIIT for sarcopenia and cachexia in older people. For instance, the lack of access to physical activity facilities, such as the need for specific equipment (i.e. fitness equipment: treadmill, bike or resistance exercise equipment) and the need for high motor skill levels to performance the high-intensity exercise (i.e. run at high speed) have been reported as another reason to older people not to do HIIT. Different HIIT programs performed outside of laboratory has been proposed, especially with body-weight exercises. The high-intensity interval body weight training (HIBWT) is performed without equipment and with low motor skill levels. HIBWT has been shown to improve fat mass, muscle mass, cardiorespiratory capacity and physical performance in young adults with or without overweight. Despite this, no previous studies have evaluated HIBWT efficacy and safe in older people with sarcopenia and cachexia. The study aim was to compare the effectiveness of CT and HIITBW on body composition, metabolic and inflammatory profile, physical function and quality of life in older women with gynecological and breast cancer and their pair-matched controls (older women with no cancer). The hypothesis of the present clinical trial is that HIITBW is effective as well as CT for improvements on body composition, metabolic and inflammatory profile, physical function and quality of life in older women with gynecological and breast cancer.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Combined training | The CT and CTc protocol (total length time \~60 min) were performed three times a week for 12 weeks, in nonconsecutive days, and were composed by 30-min walk at 70% of maximum heart rate or Borg Scale at 5-6 following resistance exercises (RE: 45-degree half squat, bench press, leg curl, rowing machine and unilateral leg extension) at 70% of one repetition maximum (1RM) with three sets of 8-12 repetitions and 1.5 min rest interval between sets and exercises. If the volunteer exceeded or did not reach the walk intensity, the volunteer was stimulated by to decrease or increase the walk speed, respectively. Regarding the resistance exercises, the load was adjusted in the 6th week with the 1RM test to ensure the 70% of 1RM between 8-12 repetitions. |
| OTHER | High intensity interval training with body weight | The HIITBW and HIITBWc protocol (total length time \~28 min) were performed three times a week for 12 weeks, in nonconsecutive days, and were composed by ten sets of 60 s of high (vigorous) intensity exercises at 80-95% of HRmax or Borg Scale at 8-9 (i.e. 30s of stepping up and down on a step and 30s of squatting up and down as fast as possible) interspersed with a recovery of 60 s of light walk (\<60% of HRmax or Borg Scale at \<5). To ensure vigorous zone of all sets, if the volunteer exceeded or did not reach the vigorous zone the volunteer was stimulated by the fitness professionals to decrease or increase the number of steps and squats, respectively. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-05-30
- Primary completion
- 2015-12-01
- Completion
- 2015-12-10
- First posted
- 2017-06-27
- Last updated
- 2017-06-27
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03200639. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.