Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03188445
Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside Versus Oral Iron Supplementation for Treatment of Iron Deficiency in Pregnancy.
Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside Versus Oral Iron Supplementation for Treatment of Iron Deficiency in Pregnancy: a Randomised, Comparative, Open-label Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 201 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Pharmacosmos A/S · Industry
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Intravenous iron isomaltoside versus oral iron supplementation for treatment of iron deficiency in pregnancy
Detailed description
Iron deficiency (ID) in pregnant women can cause iron deficiency anaemia (IDA). ID is defined by low iron stores, measured by a low level of s-ferritin. Iron is essential for the synthesis of haemoglobin (Hb). Anaemia is defined by a low Hb level (\<11.0 g/dL in 1st trimester, \<10.5 g/dL in 2nd, and \<10.5 - 11.0 g/dL in 3rd trimesters). In Danish pregnant women, who do not take iron supplementation approximately 50 % have ID and 21 % have IDA. According to WHO anaemia, defined as Hb \<11.0 g/dL, regardless the cause is estimated to occur in 24 % of Danish pregnant women. This trial is designed to evaluate and compare the effect of IV iron isomaltoside to a fixed dose of oral iron administered as tablet ferrous fumarate with ascorbic acid as correction of IDA in pregnant women after 4 weeks of standard treatment.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Iron Isomaltoside 1000 | Administered iv |
| DRUG | ferrous fumarate with ascorbic acid | Oral administration |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-07-11
- Primary completion
- 2020-06-26
- Completion
- 2020-08-18
- First posted
- 2017-06-15
- Last updated
- 2020-11-13
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Denmark
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03188445. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.