Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03185403
The Hemodynamic Effect Between Two Types of Anesthesia in Esophageal Surgery
Comparison of the Hemodynamic Effect Between the Paravertebral Block and Thoracic Epidural in Esophageal Surgery With Thoracotomy .
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 54 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Lille · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Continuous Paravertebral block (PVB) was reported to provide less episodes of hypotension than continuous thoracic epidural block (TEB). The maintenance of optimal tissue perfusion is essential for esophageal anastomosis in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. the aim of this study is to compare Hemodynamic effect of continous PVB compared to TEB , in patient undergoing oesophagectomy with laparoscopy and thoracotomy.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | paravertebral block | in the paravertebral block , the catheter was placed under ultrasound echography , at the right thoracic T4/T5 level |
| OTHER | thoracic epidural block | in the epidural block the catheter was inserted without echography , at T4/T5 level |
| DRUG | ropivacaine | |
| DRUG | Sufentanil |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-07-01
- Completion
- 2017-01-01
- First posted
- 2017-06-14
- Last updated
- 2017-06-14
Locations
1 site across 1 country: France
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03185403. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.