Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03176810
Comparison Between Optimal Coherence Tomography Guidance and Angiography Guidance in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 550 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Takashi Kubo, MD · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 100 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The present study aims to demonstrate the superiority of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with Angiography-guided PCI.
Detailed description
Comparison between Optimal Coherence tomography guidance and Angiography Guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention (COCOA) is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group, active-controlled, superiority trial comparing minimum stent area immediately after optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with those after Angiography-guided PCI with a second generation drug-eluting stent.The primary endpoint of the present study was minimum stent area immediately after PCI. The secondary endpoint was target vessel failure (defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction, and ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | OCT | OCT is used to guide PCI. |
| DEVICE | Angiography | Angiography is used to guide PCI. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-04-01
- Primary completion
- 2020-06-30
- Completion
- 2021-06-30
- First posted
- 2017-06-06
- Last updated
- 2019-10-08
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Japan
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03176810. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.