Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03176017
Ejaculatory Sparing Transurethral Incision Of The Prostate (ES-TUIP) Versus Conventional TUIP
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 40 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Mansoura University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Male
- Age
- 40 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
In this study, Investigators planned to compare ejaculatory sparing and non-ejaculatory sparing (conventional) TUIP using both subjective and objective assessment tools for the degree of deobstruction. Furthermore, the impact of both techniques on ejaculation and its secondary effect on orgasm perception and different domains of sexual function will be thoroughly assessed.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Ejaculatory sparing TUIP | The bladder neck will be incised and vaporized at the 5 or 7-o'clock position. The incision will start near the ureteral orifice and carry downward to about 0.5-1.0 cm proximal to the verumontanum |
| PROCEDURE | Conventional TUIP | the bladder neck will be incised by Collins knife at the 5 or 7-o'clock position till the verumontanum. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-10-01
- Completion
- 2021-10-01
- First posted
- 2017-06-05
- Last updated
- 2020-12-08
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03176017. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.