Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03170596
Comparison Between Microneedling Daycare Procedure and Tazarotene 0.1% Gel Local Application in Acne Scarring
Microneedling Versus Topical Tazarotene 0.1% Gel for the Treatment of Atrophic Post Acne Scarring - a Randomized Controlled Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 36 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Post acne scarring is a common complication of acne. Cosmetic appearance of the post acne facial scarring can be improved by various methods. Among the procedural methods microneedling (1) is a novel and a promising option. It is a minimally invasive day care procedure for the management of atrophic acne scars. Topical tazarotene 0.1% gel is an effective medical method in the management of acne vulgaris and macular acne scars (2, 3). Based on its mechanism of action and role in collagen synthesis, topical tazarotene is a logical choice to investigate for the management of atrophic post acne scars. This is a pilot study comparing microneedling and topical tazarotene for the treatment of atrophic post acne scarring in regard to extent and rapidity of improvement, patient satisfaction and any adverse events if any. Thirty six subjects with grade 2 to grade 4 atrophic post acne scars, classified on the basis of Goodman's Qualitative classification (4) criteria will be recruited. Goodman's qualitative and quantitative acne scarring grading system scoring will be performed for the assessment of severity of acne scarring at baseline. The face of each patient will be randomized for monthly microneedling on one side and topical tazarotene 0.1 % gel once a day local application on opposite side, using computer generated random number table. Follow ups will be done at every month until treatment completion (3 months) and 3 months after the last treatment session. Goodman's qualitative and quantitative acne scarring grading system scoring will be performed at 3rd and 6th month follow up visits. An improvement by two grades will be considered as excellent, one grade will be rated as good and no up gradation will be labelled as poor response. Patients will be also assessed by a blinded observer for clinical improvement and scored on a scale of 0 (no improvement) to 10 (maximum) at 3rd and 6th month follow up visits with the help of serial photographs taken under consistent background, position and lighting. All patients will be instructed to assess themselves using Patients' Global Assessment Score 0 (no response) to 10 (maximum) at 3rd and 6th month follow up visits. The investigators hope the outcome of the present study may propose a newer medical modality for acne scarring, i.e topical tazarotene 0.1% gel, which can be used at home, obviating the need for physician dependant microneedling procedure.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | tazarotene gel 0.1% | Patients will be instructed to apply 0.1% tazarotene gel as a thin film over the affected area once daily in the evening. |
| DEVICE | Microneedling | Microneedling is a method of percutaneous collagen induction |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-06-02
- Primary completion
- 2018-02-28
- Completion
- 2018-03-29
- First posted
- 2017-05-31
- Last updated
- 2018-04-04
Locations
1 site across 1 country: India
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03170596. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.