Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03147950
Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
Prone Versus Prone-Flexed Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Comparing Efficacy and Complication According to Clavien-Dindo Classification Score Randomised Controlled Study
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 100 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Mansoura University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
compare the prone with the prone-flexed position accessibility of upper and middle calyceal approach by subcostal puncture and PCNL reporting complications using the Clavien-Dindo system with Categorisation of PCNL-specific complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification score
Conditions
- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
- Prone Position
- Prone-Flexed Position
- Complication of Surgical Procedure
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Prone-Flexed PCNL | Prone-Flexed Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) |
| PROCEDURE | Prone PCNL | Prone Position For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-07-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-07-01
- Completion
- 2018-07-01
- First posted
- 2017-05-10
- Last updated
- 2017-06-07
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03147950. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.