Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03146299
Comparison of TLH and LAVH With Over Than 500g
Comparison of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy With Over Giant Uterus of Than 500g: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 34 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Hanyang University Seoul Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years – 55 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Since the introduction of total laparoscopic hysterectomy in 1989, laparoscopic gynecologic surgery has undergone many advances. TLH or LAVH has the advantages of faster recovery, fewer complications and shorter hospitalization compared to total abdominal hysterectomy. However, the hysterectomy for giant uterus has the difficulty of delivering the uterus out of the body. According to the results of TLH, LAVH and abdominal hysterectomy, TLH and LAVH show the postoperative complications were less frequent (3) and the postoperative recovery (4) and return to daily life were faster than total abdominal hysterectomy (3) even if it took longer operation time. Therefore, laparoscopic hysterectomy has many advantages over abdominal hysterectomy and indications are increasing. However, there has not yet been a direct comparison between TLH and VALH for large uterine surgery. In this study, we compared the results including the complications, hospitalization period and so on., in undergoing operation and post-operation between TLH and LAVH for the removal of giant uterus, which is predicted to be over 500 g.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | TLH vs LAVH | TLH: The subjects undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy with a giant uterus of 500 g or more LAVH: The subjects undergoing Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy with a giant uterus of 500 g or more |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-04-01
- Primary completion
- 2015-09-01
- Completion
- 2015-09-01
- First posted
- 2017-05-09
- Last updated
- 2017-05-09
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03146299. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.