Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03142737

Are the "ounce-equivalents" in the Protein Foods Groups Really Equivalent?

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45 (actual)
Sponsor
University of Arkansas · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
20 Years – 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

The investigators will determine effects of different sources of protein on whole-body net protein synthesis and muscle protein synthesis in young healthy participants.

Detailed description

Over the past 35 years the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) has sought to translate recommendations on nutrient requirements (i.e., Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs) from the Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) into practical nutritional advice for the American public. Over the same time interval in which the Dietary Guidelines have existed the occurrence of nutrition-related health problems in the United States has escalated dramatically, showing that the population of obesity in U.S. has reached to a total of 35.8%. In addition, the lack of appropriate focus on protein nutrition is a major shortcoming of the DGAs. Not only is the amount of protein not a major focus, but also absolutely no mention is made of protein quality. Protein quality refers to the amount, profile, and true ileal digestibility of the essential amino acids (EAAs) in the protein. However, the concept of protein quality is not new, as the Protein Digestible Corrected Amino Acid Score was published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the World Health Organization in 1993. Although animal protein (and beef specifically) has much higher the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) than plant proteins, often by as much as two fold, DIAAS has not taken account of the importance of the amount and profile of EAAs in individuals proteins. Moreover, the misrepresentation of the equivalencies of various food sources of protein in MyPlate raises the question of the process by which this occurred, and how can the process be influenced to more accurately reflect that high quality of animal proteins, including beef? Therefore, we propose to make these measurements in response to intake of "equivalent "(according to MyPlate) amounts of beef, kidney beans, eggs and peanut butter. Demonstration that the functional responses to these varied sources of protein coincide with the predictions from the USDA nutrient data base and calculation of the DIAAS will provide needed support to redefine "ounce equivalents" of protein food sources according to those data bases for all animal and plant sources of protein.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERRed kidney bean intakeEach participant will consume 1/2 cup of cooked red kidney bean
OTHEREggs intakeEach participant will consume 2 cooked large eggs.
OTHERPeanut butter intakeEach participant will consume 2 tablespoons of peanut butter.
OTHERGround beef intakeEach participant will consume 2 ounces of 90% lean ground beef.
OTHERIntact beef intakeEach participant will consume 2 ounces of intact beef.

Timeline

Start date
2017-05-08
Primary completion
2018-03-06
Completion
2019-05-15
First posted
2017-05-05
Last updated
2024-09-03

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03142737. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.