NCT03140202

Compression Is Life In Cardiac Arrest - Quality Study (CILICA-QS)

Impact of a Feedback Device, CPRmeter®, on Chest Compression Quality Preservation During Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation: A Manikin Study

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 65 (estimated)
• Sponsor: University Hospital, Caen · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 65 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

Context: Chest compressions quality is known to be essential in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Despite a known harmful effect of chest compressions interruptions, current guidelines still recommend provider switch every 2 minutes. Feedback impact on chest compressions quality preservation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation remains to be assessed. Study design: simulated prospective monocentric randomized crossover trial. Participants and methods: Sixty five professionals rescuers of the pre-hospital care unit of University Hospital of Caen (doctors, nurses and ambulance drivers) are enrolled to performed continuous chest compression on manikin (ResusciAnne®, Laerdal), twice, with and without a feedback device (CPRmeter®). Correct compression score (the main criterion) is defined by reached target of rate, depth and leaning at the same time (recorded continuously). Hypothesis: Feedback device preserve chest compression quality above the 2 minutes recommended switch over during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Conditions

• Cardiac Arrest

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	CPRmeter (feedback device) with feedback	Participants have a real time feedback and record.
DEVICE	CPRmeter (feedback device) without feedback	Participants have a real time record without feedback.

Timeline

• Start date: 2017-04-18
• Primary completion: 2017-09-15
• Completion: 2017-10-01
• First posted: 2017-05-04
• Last updated: 2017-07-19

Locations

1 site across 1 country: France