Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03133338
Effect of Early Pelvic Binder Use in Emergency Management of Suspected Pelvic Trauma: a Retrospective Cohort Study
Division of Traumatic and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- —
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrollment
- 204 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Tri-Service General Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 90 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The investigators aimed to evaluate the effect of early pelvic binder use in emergency management of suspected pelvic trauma, compared with the conventional stepwise approach.
Detailed description
There is currently no universal consensus on all aspects of management of pelvic injuries. Among patients with multiple injuries because of blunt trauma, 5%-16% sustain injuries to the pelvic ring, resulting in a mortality rate of 11%-54% primarily due to hemorrhagic shock. In theory, the reduction and stabilization of the pelvic ring can decrease bleeding from the fracture site, as reduction of pelvic volume has been shown to reduce the extent of hemorrhage from such injuries.The application of a pelvic binder has become part of the emergency care of all trauma patients with suspected pelvic fractures, in both the pre-hospital environment and emergency department (ED). The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the early use of pelvic binders to treat patients with a suspected high risk of pelvic bleeding from blunt force pelvic fractures.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | pelvic binder | The requirement of angioembolization can be predicted by the presence of intravenous contrast extravasation (ICE) on computed tomography (CT) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-07-31
- Completion
- 2014-07-31
- First posted
- 2017-04-28
- Last updated
- 2017-05-02
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03133338. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.