Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03130270
Maintenance Treatment of Apatinib in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Phase II Trial of Maintenance Apatinib After Second-Line Treatment for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 29 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Guilin Medical University, China · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Apatinib for later treatment of patients(after second-line treatment for locally recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma), including overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS); the relationship between EBV DNA copy number and survival after radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy; Quality of life score (QoL); evaluation of drug safety.
Detailed description
In locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC), although fist-line therapy with radiotherapy and chemotherapy (Cisplatin/Docetaxel/5-Fu) and second-line therapy with chemotherapy has been given, patients still locally recurrence and distant metastasis. There is no standard treatment recommendation for locally recurrent or metastatic NPC who failed to second-line therapy. Apatinib has been approved as a second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. Several phase III studies of liver cancer, non small cell lung cancer and other tumors also showed apatinib has less toxicities and better tolerance. However, the clinical application of apatinib in nasopharyngeal carcinoma is still lack of evidence-based medicine. And this trial is designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in locally recurrent or metastatic NPC.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Apatinib mesylate tablet | Patients with locally recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after second-line treatment are assigned to receive apatinib mesylate tablet. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 days (4 weeks). The starting dose was 500 mg, orally, qd; tolerance assessment for a cycle, patients with poorly tolerance were treated with low dose (500 mg, qd), and patients with well tolerance were treated with high dose (750 mg, qd). All patients continuous treatment until progression disease or non-tolerated toxicity. Note: good tolerance was defined that no grade 3/4 hematology or/and non hematologic side effects occurred within 4 weeks after initiation treatment; poor tolerance was defined that grade 3/4 hematology or/and non hematologic side effects appeared within 4 weeks after initiation treatment. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2019-04-08
- Completion
- 2019-12-08
- First posted
- 2017-04-26
- Last updated
- 2018-05-16
Locations
4 sites across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03130270. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.